Established in 2003, Malaria Consortium is one of the world’s leading non-profit organisations specialising in the prevention, control and treatment of malaria and other communicable diseases among vulnerable populations. Our mission is to save lives and improve health in Africa and Asia, through evidence-based programmes that combat targeted diseases and promote universal health coverage.
We are recruiting to fill the position below:
Job Title: National Consultant – Political Economy Analysis (PEA) Evaluation Specialist
Location: Osun
Employment Type: Contract
Background
Malaria Consortium is one of the world's leading non-profit organizations dedicated to improving health and saving lives in communities affected by malaria and related inequities in Africa and Southeast Asia.
The Organization works with communities, government and non-government agencies, academic institutions, and local and international organizations, to deliver scalable, locally led solutions grounded in research and evidence to strengthen health systems, inform policy, and drive sustainable impact through strategic partnerships and organizational excellence.
Despite modest gains, child mortality in Nigeria remains high. The 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) report an under-five mortality rate of 110 per 1,000 live births (down from 132 in 2018) and a neonatal mortality rate of 41 per 1,000 live births, indicating that a substantial proportion of child deaths occur early in life².
However, Malaria remains a leading contributor to outpatient visits, childhood illness, and mortality, with significant socio-economic consequences for families and public services. Currently, Nigeria bears a disproportionate share of the global malaria burden, accounting for approximately one quarter to one third of global malaria cases and deaths, with largely perennial transmission and marked subnational heterogeneity¹.
The national malaria strategy prioritizes preventive interventions, including LLINs, SMC, and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp).
However, infants and young children in perennial transmission settings remain insufficiently protected, particularly between 2 and 18 months of age. Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention (PMC), endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO), extends chemoprevention to infants and young children in moderate-to-high and perennial transmission settings; and the updated consolidated guidelines allow countries to tailor chemoprevention strategies to local epidemiology, including perennial delivery through routine health platforms³.
In Nigeria, Malaria Consortium (MC) piloted PMC program through the administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) integrated on the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) platform in Osun State between 2023 to 2025. Early evidence indicates high acceptability and operational feasibility.
However, Nigeria’s decentralized governance structure, health financing constraints, and donor-dependent malaria response create complex incentives for adopting and sustaining new health program interventions.
While past scale-up of malaria interventions such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) demonstrates that political commitment and donor alignment can rapidly expand coverage, these experiences also highlight policy adoption and sustainability risks where domestic financing and institutional ownership are weak¹.
These political and institutional dynamics strongly influence how epidemiological, operational, and economic evidence informs policy decisions at federal, state, and local government levels.
The above highlighted evidence suggests that national scale-up of PMC requires more than technical effectiveness. It demands careful navigation of political economy realities, including fiscal space, intergovernmental coordination, institutional incentives, and community perceptions.
A structured Political Economy Analysis (PEA) is therefore critical to identify power relations, financing dynamics, governance bottlenecks, and social drivers that will ultimately determine PMC policy adoption, scale-up, and sustainability within Nigeria’s malaria control and child survival agenda¹,³.
Objective of the Study
The primary objective of the study is to examine how political, economic, institutional dynamics and perception influence PMC operational feasibility, policy adoption and integration as one of the malaria control strategies in Nigeria.
The secondary objectives of the study are to generate contextual, robust political economy evidence on the enablers and constraints shaping the adoption, scale-up, and sustainability of Perennial Malaria Chemoprevention (PMC) as a national malaria control strategy in Nigeria.
Specifically, the study will:
Identify the key incentives, constraints, and power relations among stakeholders (e.g. NPHCDA, FMoH and state actors) that shape decision-making around PMC sustainability and scale-up.
Generate insights on how current political will, governance structure and existing legislations influence PMC adoption as malaria control strategy
Explore the role of financial, donor support, and domestic budget priorities in influencing PMC sustainability.
Generate information on how the stakeholder`s perceived institutional readiness of federal and state health systems to integrate PMC within existing malaria and child health programmes.
Explore community-level perceptions and the influence of traditional, religious, and civil society leadership on the acceptability and sustainability of PMC delivery.
Explore the role of Nigeria’s fiscal federalism, donor financing architecture, domestic budget priorities and health sector governance arrangements in enabling or constraining policy adoption, scale-up and sustainability of PMC in Nigeria
Generate actionable recommendations for policymakers, donors, and implementers to strengthen the political, policy adoption and economic feasibility of PMC in Nigeria
Evaluation approach and framework
This Political Economy Analysis (PEA) study will employ a hybrid methodology that integrates Problem-Driven Political Economy Analysis (PD-PEA) and the Health System Structures framework.
The PD-PEA approach will map actors, incentives, interests, power relations, and decision pathways across federal, state, local government area (LGA), and community levels to identify windows of opportunity and resistance in the policy process, as well as to propose feasible political and financing strategies for the policy adoption and sustainability of PMC in Nigeria. Concurrently, the Health System Structures framework will evaluate operational and institutional readiness by assessing key components, including leadership and governance, financing, procurement and supply chain, workforce capacity, service delivery (aligned with the Expanded Programme on Immunization), monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and community engagement.
Conceptual and Analytical Framework:
The conceptual framework will combine:
Problem-Driven Political Economy Analysis (PD-PEA) by exploring foundational factors, rules of the game, and here-and-now dynamics that shape PMC adoption.
Health System Structures Framework by assessing institutional capacity, governance, and service delivery readiness.
This multi-framework approach ensures the analysis captures both political and institutional realities and their implications for PMC policy adoption, operational feasibility, scale up and sustainability.
Methodology
Methods: Multi-method qualitative design guided by political economy and health systems frameworks will be used for this study. This method will combine document review, in-depth interviews, Key Informant interviews and focus group discussions. Data triangulation across document reviews and qualitative sources will anchor causal inferences and policy options.
The study will apply a multi-method qualitative approach including:
Desk review of policy, budget and program documents.
Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with health administrators and policy makers at the federal, state, LGA, and community actors.
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with caregivers
Facility readiness and budget assessments using structured checklists.
The analysis will be guided by the Analytical Mapping Framework by linking research questions to study objectives, stakeholders, and data sources across governance levels.
Levels and sample frame: Multi-level inquiry (Federal; Osun State; LGAs; facility & community) with purposive sampling of policy actors (FMoH, NMEP, NPHCDA, NAFDAC), finance and legislative stakeholders (MoF, National Assembly Committees), state and LGA implementers (SMOH, SMEP, SPHCDA, RBM, PHC departments), frontline staff (EPI focal persons, LIOs), and CSOs, and caregivers/traditional leaders in eight (8) Osun LGAs (Ayedaade, Ede South, Atakunmosa West, Iwo, Irewole, Ife North, Obokun, Egbedore).
The study will be iterative as field insights will continue to refine sampling to probe emergent political or institutional dynamics.
Purpose of the assignment
The PEA qualitative evaluation aims to:
Diagnose the political, institutional, financial barriers, Interests, power relations, decision pathways and enablers to national PMC adoption, state rollout, and sustainable financing in Nigeria.
Assess operational readiness of health systems (EPI platform, supply chain, HR, M&E) to incorporate monthly/perennial SP delivery.
Map actor networks, power dynamics and incentive structures that shapes policy choices and resource allocation for PMC.
Produce actionable recommendations and advocacy products (policy briefs, strategic options matrix, actor-influence map) to inform decision-making by NMEP, FMoH, NPHCDA, State MoH/SMEP, Ministry of Finance and donors.
Scope of Work
The scope is national but context-specific, with specific focus on pilot state (Osun) and across stakeholders at national level.
The team will be responsible for the end-to-end execution of the study, including protocol and tools refinement, stakeholder mapping, training, data collection, data quality assurance, analysis, reporting, and dissemination.
The study will cover four governance levels - federal, state, LGA, and community levels - with a focus on actors, institutions, and processes relevant to malaria policy and child health.
At the federal level: Ministry of Health, NMEP, NPHCDA, National Assembly health and finance committees, Ministry of Finance/Budget, donors, and development partners.
At the state level: Commissioners of Health, SMEPs, State PHC Boards, State Ministries of Finance and Planning, and implementing partners.
At the LGA level: Directors of PHC, Local Immunization Officers (LIOs), Ward Focal Persons, and PHC management committees.
At the community level: frontline health workers, EPI focal persons, caregivers, community leaders, traditional/religious leaders, and CSOs.
National Consultants - PEA Evaluation Specialist
The National Consultants will be responsible for data collection across LGAs, state, and national levels, involving conducting key informant interviews (KIIs)/in-depth interviews with stakeholders at all levels, participating in facility and community assessments, and contributing to data analysis and reporting.
The consultant will contribute to finalization of data collection guides, ensure fidelity of the data collection process as guided by the PD-PEA and Health System Structures frameworks.
Specific Tasks for National Consultants – PEA Evaluation Specialist:
Conduct key informant interviews (KIIs) or In-depth Interviews at the community, LGAs and State levels with stakeholders, including SMOH, SMEP, SPHCDA, RBM, etc), LGA implementers, PHC departments and frontline health workers (EPI focal persons, LIOs), and private sector and CSOs etc.
Support contextualization of interview tools and ensure accurate translation/back-translation for KIIs, focus group discussions (FGDs) recordings, and facility/community assessments checklist.
Use structured observation checklists for facility readiness assessments during facility visit
Validate at 100% the KII/IDI or FGDs interview records translation and transcription submitted by Research Assistants
Participate in daily debrief sessions to discuss insights from data collection across all levels and contribute to iterative refinements of data collection approaches.
Develop coding for all the interview transcripts and apply a coding framework (e.g., NVivo/ATLAS.ti) aligned with PD-PEA constructs for data analysis
Summarize emerging findings by respondent type (federal policymakers, state officials, LGA implementers, frontline staff, etc.) to inform thematic analysis.
Contribute to thematic synthesis and drafting of the sections of the final report, incorporating insights from data collection at national, state, LGA, and facility/community levels.
Key Deliverables:
Completed KIIs/IDIs from, state, and LGA levels, with signed consent forms.
Validated transcripts and translation outputs.
Coded transcripts and thematic matrices reflecting insights from stakeholders across all levels.
Records of all the KII/IDIs interviews and translated/transcribed documents
Harmonized field report, incorporating findings from interviews and assessments at national, state, LGA, and facility/community levels.
Evidence of validated transcription and translated records.
Person Specification for National Consultants – PEA Evaluation Specialist
Essential:
Postgraduate degree in Public Health, Political Science, Sociology, Anthropology, Demography or other relevant social science field.
At least 5 years of experience conducting and analysing qualitative data in political economy or health system studies, including KIIs with high-level stakeholders (e.g., federal and state officials).
Existing relationships and access to House of representative health committee members, ministry of finance and budget and minister of state for health
Ability to develop stakeholders mapping across all the Ministry Department and Agencies (MDAs) with contact of all the representatives for interview
Demonstrated expertise in multi-level data collection (national, state, LGA), stakeholder engagement, and application of PD-PEA for mapping actors, incentives, and power relations.
Skilled in quality assurance procedures, such as validating transcripts, applying coding frameworks, and summarizing findings by respondent type.
Proficient in computer use, including qualitative analysis software (e.g., NVivo, ATLAS.ti, QDA Minner), digital data collection platforms (e.g., ODK, SurveyCTO), and Microsoft Office tools.
Strong facilitation and interpersonal skills, with experience in debrief sessions and iterative refinements based on field dynamics.
Ability to fluently speak Yoruba, especially for translating local expressions and supporting culturally appropriate interactions in Osun State.
Excellent attention to detail, particularly in data validation, theme identification, and ethical standards.
Residency in or strong familiarity with Osun State.
Desired:
Ability to develop stakeholders mapping across all the Ministry Department and Agencies (MDAs) with contact of all the representatives for interview
Demonstrated expertise in multi-level data collection (national, state, LGA), stakeholder engagement, and application of PD-PEA for mapping actors, incentives, and power relations.
Ability to fluently speak Yoruba, especially for translating local expressions and supporting culturally appropriate interactions in Osun State.
Skilled in quality assurance procedures, such as validating transcripts, applying coding frameworks, and summarizing findings by respondent type.
Kindly note that applicants who do not follow this specification will be disqualified.
Only Shortlisted candidates will be contacted.
Kindly note that applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis, and as a result, the process may conclude before the advertised deadline.
Therefore, early applications are highly encouraged.
Malaria Consortium does not accept or ask for payment during recruitment.
We also would not accept hardcopy CVs; all applications should be sent through the above link.
Safeguarding: Malaria Consortium is committed to protecting children and vulnerable adults and ensuring that all staff, partners, and representatives uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct.
Our Safeguarding Policy outlines our responsibility to prevent abuse, harassment, and exploitation in all areas of our work.
We expect everyone working with us staff, consultants, volunteers, and partners to adhere to this policy and our Code of Conduct.
By following these standards, we help create safe environments and reduce any risk of harm in the communities we serve.